Overall I liked the ceremony - it had a lot of heart, even if it wasn't as big or showy as the Olympic one. It's purpose and tone was entirely different than the Olympic Opening Ceremony. I suppose that makes sense. The goal of the Olympics was to showcase Vancouver, and Canada and how well the organizing committee can put on a successful games - it's a huge commercial really. Whereas the Paralympics are focused solely on the athletes and the fact they are participating.
And really, while obviously Canadian examples of Terry Fox and Rick Hansen were profiled, the theme of "One Inspires Many" fits very well with the International Paralympic Committee's vision and mission.
Interestingly, before the Olympic Opening Ceremony most interest surrounded the probability of Rick Hansen or Terry Fox's parents being the final torch bearer who was to light the cauldron. As it turned out, all were involved on the final day's run (Rick Hansen making it into the stadium). And at no time did I ever hear anyone make any Olympic vs. Paralympic arguments. It was all about how to best represent Vancouver, Canada, athletic endeavour and the human spirit. Kinda makes you warm and fuzzy inside, doesn't it?
Posts
